When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach.
By Jennifer M. George, Jing Zhou. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
1,472 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5bd20aac66f94af3c4cff6dcd28f5a10144d025
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jing Zhou
- Christina E. Shalley
- Alice H. Y. Hon
- Markus Baer
- Abraham Carmeli
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
- Yaping Gong
- James C. Kaufman
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Sharon K. Parker
- Jing Zhou
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Adam M. Grant
- Alice H. Y. Hon
- Christina E. Shalley
In Social Psychology
- Sharon K. Parker
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Jing Zhou
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Adam M. Grant
- Alice H. Y. Hon
- Christina E. Shalley
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
Citations in the corpus
- Structure and freedom in creativity: The interplay between externally imposed structure and personal cognitive style (2010, background): “Several empirical studies have indicated that personal attributes interact with situational factors to impact creativity (e.g., George & Zhou, 2001; Tierney, Farmer, & Graen, 1999; Zhou & George, 2001).”
- Transformational leadership and job performance : a social identity perspective (2014, methodology): “Supervisors rate the extent towhich individuals performed creatively using an 8-itemabbreviated version of George and Zhou's (2001) creativity scale.”
- Personality, attitude, and leader influences on divergent thinking and creativity in organizations (2004, background): “Openness to experience is a personality trait associated with individual creative performance in organizations ( George and Zhou, 2001”
- Nature at home and at work: Naturally good? Links between window views, indoor plants, outdoor activities and employee well-being over one year (2017, methodology): “Creativity at work was measured with three items (e.g., “My head is full of innovative ideas that are related to my work”, Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84T1 and 0.86T2) (George & Zhou, 2001; Jaussi, Randel, & Dionne, 2007) rated on a scale from 1 (very seldom or never) to 5 (very often or always).”
- The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. (2006, background): “Similar to earlier research concerned with creativity in the workplace and the possible role of openness to experience and support (e.g., George & Zhou, 2001; Zhou, 2003), our results indicated that both openness to experience and support for creativity had only weak, direct relations to employee…”
- Investigating the influences of core self‐evaluations, job autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on in‐role job performance (2010, background): “…role of personality at work tends to be limited to the Big Five personality traits of neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience (e.g., Barrick & Mount, 1993; Caligiuri, 2000; George & Zhou, 2001; Hurtz & Donovan, 2000; Tett, Jackson, & Rothstein, 2006).”
- Unfolding the Proactive Process for Creativity (2012, methodology): “This scale is one of the commonly used creativity measures for field studies (Zhou & Shalley, 2003) and has been shown to be valid and reliable in prior studies (e.g., George & Zhou, 2001, 2007; Shin & Zhou, 2003; Zhang & Bartol, 2010).”