The handling of nonresponse error

By L. Dooley, J. Lindner. 2003

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5b19052013432b609bc8985f512208feba212d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Factors influencing teachers' engagement in informal learning activities (2006, result): “This comparison indicates that the respondents and the teacher population are highly similar with respect to these demographic characteristics and, therefore, increases the confidence with which the results of the study may be generalized to the population ( Dooley and Lindner, 2003”
The relationships among commitment to change,coping with change, and turnover intentions (2006, background): “Given the lack of differences between early and late respondents, nonresponse bias is likely not a concern (Dooley & Linder, 2003).”
Technology-Market Combinations and the Identification of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: An Investigation of the Opportunity-Individual Nexus (2012, methodology): “To assess the possibility of nonresponse bias, we tested whether early and late respondents differed on the hypothesized parameters and in their individual or firm characteristics (Dooley & Lindner, 2003).”
Capacity of Mass Participant Sport Events for the Development of Activity Commitment and Future Exercise Intention (2011, methodology): “This extrapolation method is based on the premise that nonrespondents can be considered linear extensions of those respondents who reply latest in the data collection process ( Dooley & Lindner, 2003 ; Miller & Smith, 1983 ).”
The Motivational Effects of Diminished Self-Esteem for Employees Who Experience Abusive Supervision (2017, methodology): “Results of ANOVA tests indicated no significant differences between the Time 2 responders and nonresponders on demographics or Time 1 variables (Dooley & Lindner, 2003).”