GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES

By A. Bandura. 2006

5,598 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e55c7382e8cd2d0ad48deb530df9ddd874189355

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. Usher
2. C. Wolters
3. M. Bong
4. Robert W. Lent
5. Anastasia Kitsantas
6. N. Betz
7. Sungjun Won
8. B. Zimmerman

Citations in the corpus

• Relation of Depression and Affectivity to Career Decision Status and Self-Efficacy in College Students (2009, background): “Although researchers emphasize the benefits of domain specificity when examining self-efficacy (Bandura, 2006; Betz & Rottinghaus, 2006), broader levels are commonly considered, including studies involving relation to depression (Maciejewski, Prigerson, & Mazure, 2000), affect (Bower, 1981; Larson…”
• Sources of Middle School Students’ Self-Efficacy in Mathematics: A Qualitative Investigation (2009, methodology): “Following the guidelines set forth by Bandura (2006), these measures assessed self-efficacy at four levels, ranging from most to least specific: mathematics skills self-efficacy (e.g., I can successfully solve math exercises involving inequalities), self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in…”
• Beliefs About Emotion: Links to Emotion Regulation, Well-Being, and Psychological Distress (2013, background): “Because personal and domain specific beliefs are typically better predictors of goals, attributions, motivation, and performance (Bandura, 1997, 2006; De Castella & Byrne, 2012), a firstperson measure of people’s implicit beliefs about their own emotion may serve as an even better predictor of…”
• Engineering Students' Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future (2018, background): “Task-specific motivation seeks to understand student motivation, such as self-efficacy (Bandura, 2006), for performing and completing a specific task, such as solving a problem (Hutchison, Follman, Sumpter, & Bodner, 2006).”
• Cultivating Principals’ Self-Efficacy: Supports that Matter (2007, methodology): “This instrument was patterned on Bandura’s unpublished Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale, and it follows the guidelines outlined in his monograph on the construction of self-efficacy scales (Bandura, 2001).”
• Self-Efficacy: A Foundational Concept for Positive Clinical Psychology (2016, background): “of self-efficacy are better predictors of behavior than the general measures of self-efficacy (Bandura, 2006).”
• An empirical analysis of the factors affecting social entrepreneurial intentions (2017, background): “on the pre- entrepreneurial stage and integrate attitude and behaviour theory (Ajzen 1991), and self-efficacy and social learning theory (Bandura and Bandura 1997).”
• Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study (2009, methodology): “…mathematics self-efficacy using four measures: mathematics grade self-efficacy and mathematics courses self-efficacy (Bandura, 2006; Hackett & Betz, 1989); mathematics skills self-efficacy (see NCTM, 2000); and self-efficacy for self-regulated learning (Bandura, 2006; Usher & Pajares, 2008).”
• Career Self-Efficacy Theory: Back to the Future (2006, background): “Therefore, self-efficacy must be measured against some type of behavior (Bandura, 1997, 2005).”