The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance
By David L. Levy, Halina Szejnwald Brown, M. de Jong. 2010
347 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5573df3512fef71755ee70de76e949ff7cb0d22
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- J. Pinkse
- F. Fortanier
- Ans Kolk
- M. Rodríguez
- M. Alonso‐Almeida
- Ralitza Nikolaeva
- F. Marimon
- Lujie Chen
In Strategy and Management
- J. Pinkse
- Ans Kolk
- F. Fortanier
- M. Rodríguez
- M. Alonso‐Almeida
- Ralitza Nikolaeva
- F. Marimon
- Lujie Chen
Citations in the corpus
- How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative (2015, neutral): “2009a-b; Levy et al., 2010; Nikolaeva & Bicho, 2011; Waddock, 2007).”
- The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry (2015, methodology): “…for this research, since it is expected to be commonly adopted global criterion for CSR and sustainability reporting according to the literature (Skouloudis et al., 2009; Prado‐ Lorenzo et al., 2009; Tsang et al., 2009; Brown et al., 2009; Rasche, 2009; Levy et al., 2010; Marimon et al., 2012).”
- Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market (2017, neutral): “In line with Simnett et al. (2009), Levy et al. (2010) and Gallo and Christensen (2011), we control for firm size (SIZE) in our model since larger companies are subject to greater pressure in terms of responding to stakeholder demands and they tend to report more on their CSR practices in order to…”
- The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards (2011, methodology): “In fact, the GRI founders used this argument to reconcile tensions between the corporate world and NGOs and to frame GRI as a win-win partnership ( Levy et al. 2010 ).”
- Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Role of Regulatory Reform in Integrated Reporting (2015, neutral): “One outcome of the process was to produce standardised information that could empower civil society organisations,2 such as NGOs, to demand greater corporate accountability (Levy et al. 2010).”
- The worldwide diffusion of the global reporting initiative: what is the point? (2012, methodology): “Fourth, with respect to trends in the adoption of the GRI, adoption rates will slightly increase in the next three years despite the high costs associated with the collection, verification and design of reports (Koerber 2010; Levy et al. 2010).”
- Harmonization in CSR Reporting (2011, background): “…all initiatives of such international organizations that tend to have been developed through a process of multistakeholder engagement with a wide variety of governmental, non-governmental and corporate actors, in which, interestingly, MNEs appear to have played a pivotal role (Levy et al. 2010).”
- Social Movements as Catalysts for Corporate Social Innovation: Environmental Activism and the Adoption of Green Information Systems (2019, neutral): “Although these disclosure-based initiatives were initiated by activists with the intention of pressuring business for change, they have moved toward multistakeholder governance mechanisms as they attempted to enlist accountancy firms and investors, along with the target businesses, in their effort t”