Instructor–Learner Interaction in Online Courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction

By Vanessa Paz Dennen *, Aubteen Darabi, Linda J. Smith. 2007

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5129f9e436af57e6ee7293e96238dc5de49ae55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Charles B. Hodges
2. Chanmin Kim
3. Marcia D Dixson
4. Mohammad Issack Santally
5. Yousra Banoor Rajabalee

In Social Psychology

1. Charles B. Hodges
2. Chanmin Kim
3. Marcia D Dixson

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). (2015, background): “Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning (Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea, Li, & Pickett, 2006; Swan, Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz, & Maher, 2000).”
• Effects of an emotion control treatment on academic emotions, motivation and achievement in an online mathematics course (2012, background): “Lack of personal contact between students and instructors as well as among students in online mathematics courses makes it challenging for instructors to devote the individual attention required to help students overcome specific problems with emotions and motivation ( Dennen et al. 2007; Stillson ”
• Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? (2010, background): “Dennen et al. (2007) did find, however, that too much instructor participation in discussion boards etc.”