Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences
By Alexander Todorov, A. Goren, Yaacov Trope. 2007
251 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4f82b2bf91f32f35ea9a016e7ad46fbba009b62
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Cheryl J. Wakslak
- Nathan Novemsky
- E. Baskin
- Yaacov Trope
- Kentaro Fujita
- Nira Liberman
- John G. Lynch
- Gal Zauberman
In General Decision Sciences
In Social Psychology
- Cheryl J. Wakslak
- Nathan Novemsky
- E. Baskin
- Yaacov Trope
- Kentaro Fujita
- Nira Liberman
- John G. Lynch
- Gal Zauberman
Citations in the corpus
- Learning from yesterday's mistakes to fix tomorrow's problems: When functional counterfactual thinking and psychological distance collide (2012, background): “For example, Wakslak and Trope (2009) varied construal level mindsets (high versus low level) and measured their effects on probability estimates.”
- Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers: A Construal-Level Approach to Gift Giving (2014, result): “Similar results have been found for other dimensions of psychological distance, including spatial distance (Fujita et al. 2006a), hypotheticality (Todorov, Goren, and Trope 2007; Wakslak et al. 2006), and social distance (Liviatan, Trope, and Liberman 2008).”
- Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance (2010, unknown): “Similar results have been found for other distance dimensions, including hypotheticality and social distance (e.g., Liviatan et al., 2008; Todorov, Goren, & Trope, 2007; see review by Liberman et al., 2007).”