Test of Word Reading Efficiency

412 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using Multiple Measures of Morphological Awareness to Assess its Relation to Reading (2013, background): “This knowledge undoubtedly aids word-level reading, even for pseudoword reading, given that some pseudowords actually contain real affixes (e.g., on the TOWRE, the affixes -y, -er, -or, and -ed are attached to pseudowords) (Torgesen et al., 1999).”
Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm (2005, neutral): “In an initial step the values of all parameters are set to random values between lower and upper limits which are chosen by the user.”
Australian comparison data for the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) (2013, methodology): “The TOWRE covers a representative sample of the domain behaviour, (i.e., reading fluency: Torgesen et al., 1999), criterion-prediction validity (the TOWRE effectively correlates with and predicts other related reading outcomes: Tanna, 2009) and construct- development of the TOWRE was based:…”