Psychometric Assessment of an Instrument Designed to Measure Work Life Balance

By J. Hayman. 2005

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2f7a9d4458679fe52e67fcc3b043227425af0fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Job stress, wellbeing, work-life balance and work-life conflict among Australian academics (2012, background): “The concepts ‘Work-life balance’ and ‘Work-life conflict’ have received much attention in academic literature (Hayman, 2005; Moore, 2007; Pocock, 2005).”
Work-Related Communication Technology Use Outside of Regular Work Hours and Work Life Conflict (2014, background): “However, conceptualizing work life conflict can be somewhat complex, and a number of researchers have conceptualized and operationalized work life conflict in a variety of ways (see Cowan & Hoffman, 2007; Edley, 2001; Golden & Geisler, 2007; Hayman, 2005; Shumate & Fulk, 2004).”
The mediating effect of work–life balance on the relationship between work–family conflict and life satisfaction (2017, methodology): “…life enhancement) work–life balance scale (cited by Fisher-McAuley, Stanton, Jolton, & Gavin, 2003), which has been used by other researchers (e.g., Hayman, 2005); however, the three-factor structure has not been confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (FisherMcAuley, Stanton, Jolton, &…”
Work Life Balance: What DO You Mean? The Ethical Ideology Underpinning Appropriate Application (2007, methodology): “A measure recently presented is an adaptation by Hayman (2005) of a scale originally developed by Fisher-McAuley, Stanton, Jolton, and Gavin (2003).”
Challenges for work–life balance during COVID-19 induced nationwide lockdown: exploring gender difference in emotional exhaustion in the Indian setting (2020, methodology): “To measure WIPL, three items were adapted from the scale of Hayman (2005), and two new items were developed and included in the scale.”
Gender Differences in the Perception of Work-Life Balance (2010, methodology): “Variables in the questionnaire were selected based on the studies published by Hyman et al. (Hyman et al. 2003; Hayman 2005).”
Flexible work arrangements: exploring the linkages between perceived usability of flexible work schedules and work/life balance (2009, methodology): “In this study, work/life balance is conceptualised based on previous research (Fisher-McAuley, Stanton, Jolton & Gavin 2003; Hayman 2005) that includes the negative influence of work on personal life as well as positive enhancement between work and non work.”
Work Life Balance: A Conceptual Review (2018, methodology): “Hayman [34] validated the scale with 15 items for assessing the construct of work life balance instead of 19 items in the original scale.”