Exploring the processes of firm growth: evidence from a vector auto-regression

By Alex Coad. 2010

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2548a39f376681adb4048701cf964709925e011

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

My first employee: an empirical investigation (2016, background): “However, after having recognized that these two dimensions of growth are distinct, the question then turns to whether one precedes the other (Coad 2010; Achtenhagen et al. 2010).”
Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms (2013, unknown): “For example, in a study of French manufacturing firms with more than 20 employees, Coad (2010) finds a positive but weak relationship between profits and sales and employment growth.”
High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section (2014, background): “Although sales and employment growth are only modestly correlated (Shepherd and Wiklund, 2009; Coad, 2010), most studies suggest that the results do not seem to be sensitive to which one is chosen (Daunfeldt et al.”
Corporate performances and market selection. Some comparative evidence (2010, background): “4Similar issues are considered through a VAR analysis in Coad et al. (2010) and in Coad (2010), respectively, Italian and French manufacturing data.”
High-growth firms and technological knowledge: do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies? (2014, methodology): “In order to better grasp the potential coevolutionary patterns of such interdependent variable we implement the analysis within the context of a (reduced form) vector autoregression (VAR) model (Coad, 2010).”
An Assessment of Resource-Based Theorizing on Firm Growth and Suggestions for the Future (2018, background): “Performance is generally difficult to explain, and predicting growth has proven particularly elusive (Coad, 2010).”
‘Better late than never’: the interplay between green technology and age for firm growth (2017, methodology): “3.3 Variables Our dependent variable is the growth rate of employees (Growthit), calculated as the difference between the logarithm of firm i’s employees in year t and the logarithm of employees in year t − 1 (Coad and Rao 2006; Coad 2010) (see Online Appendix A3 for details).”
The Effectiveness of University Knowledge Spillovers: Performance Differences between University Spinoffs and Corporate Spinoffs (2011, methodology): “Consistent with prior research, we used the formula log(sizet1/sizet0) to compute the respective growth rates (cf. Coad, 2010).”
Firm Growth: Empirical Analysis (2010, background): “Furthermore, advanced econometric techniques also show that profits have a negligible causal effect on firm growth rates (Coad, 2007b; Moneta, Entner, Hoyer, and Coad, 2010).”
Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? (2016, unknown): “Previous work on the age distribution of firms suggests that the firm age distribution of the population of firms is approximately exponential (Coad, 2010).”