High-growth firms and technological knowledge: do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies?

By Alessandra Colombelli, Jackie Krafft, F. Quatraro. 2014

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/204d7da0efd91dff778f9b18825213190c6d83cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section (2014, methodology): “Colombelli et al. (2014) focus on the contribution of HGFs to knowledge creation and innovation, using data on 335 European firms with 1þ patents.”
The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology (2014, background): “Recent research shows that the properties of knowledge bases in terms of coherence, variety and cognitive distance affect economic and technological performances at different levels of aggregation (Colombelli et al., 2013, 2014; Antonelli and Colombelli, 2013; Quatraro, 2010).”
Myth-busting and entrepreneurship policy: the case of high growth firms (2017, background): “intensive firms, as the innovative capabilities of these firms are built on the exploration of familiar technologies (Colombelli et al. 2014).”
Firm age and performance (2017, background): “One may be labelled the Ecology approach in reference to Hannan and Freeman (1984). The alternative can be labelled Evolutionary in reference to Jovanovic (1982), although its principles also adhere closely to Nelson andWinter (1982).”
To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups (2016, unknown): “…recent studies have demonstrated that the propensity for innovation emerges as a firm’s growth driver (see Coad and Rao 2008; Altindag et al. 2011; Colombelli et al. 2014a, b) and specifically as a positive predictor of survival and an above-average post-entry performance in terms of…”