Unmasking Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Senescent Cells

By Alejandra Hernandez-Segura, Tristan de Jong, S. Melov, V. Guryev, J. Campisi, M. Demaria. Current Biology, 2017

778 citations recorded by the source corpus.

SUMMARY Cellular senescence is a state of irreversibly arrested proliferation, often induced by genotoxic stress [1]. Senescent cells participate in a variety of physiological and pathological conditions, including tumor suppression [2], embryonic development [3, 4], tissue repair [5–8], and organismal aging [9]. The senescence program is variably characterized by several non-exclusive markers, including constitutive DNA damage response (DDR) signaling, senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-βgal) activity, increased expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors p16INK4A (CDKN2A) and p21CIP1 (CDKN1A), increased secretion of many bio-active factors (the senescence-associated secretory phenotype, or SASP), and reduced expression of the nuclear lamina protein LaminB1 (LMNB1) [1]. Many senescence-associated markers result from altered transcription, but the senescent phenotype is variable, and methods for clearly identifying senescent cells are lacking [10]. Here, we characterize the heterogeneity of the senescence program using numerous whole-transcriptome datasets generated by us or publicly available. We identify transcriptome signatures associated with specific senescence-inducing stresses or senescent cell types and identify and validate genes that are commonly differentially regulated. We also show that the senescent phenotype is dynamic, changing at varying intervals after senescence induction. Identifying novel transcriptome signatures to detect any type of senescent cell or to discriminate among diverse senescence programs is an attractive strategy for determining the diverse biological roles of senescent cells and developing specific drug targets.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2255d82289fb291aa81913ed4cb5f95bf6d8aa1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Luigi Ferrucci
  2. C. Gottardi
  3. J. Campisi
  4. R. Hamanaka
  5. A. Shilatifard
  6. R. Guzy
  7. Navdeep S. Chandel
  8. M. Demaria

In Physiology

  1. Luigi Ferrucci
  2. J. Campisi
  3. R. Hamanaka
  4. R. Guzy
  5. M. Demaria
  6. Jesús Gil
  7. Adam Freund
  8. J. Kirkland

Citations in the corpus