Validity Evidence in a University Group Oral Test.

By A. V. Moere. 2006

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e21155e2a62c5d6898ef7b780f82e5f051d06061

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. L. Taylor
2. G. Ockey
3. E. Galaczi
4. Lindsay Brooks
5. Frank Giraldo

In General Health Professions

1. L. Taylor
2. G. Ockey
3. E. Galaczi
4. Lindsay Brooks

In Language and Linguistics

1. L. Taylor
2. Lindsay Brooks
3. E. Galaczi
4. G. Ockey
5. Larry Davis
6. Lyn May
7. Daniel M. K. Lam
8. Frank Giraldo

Citations in the corpus

• Interactional Competence: Conceptualisations, Operationalisations, and Outstanding Questions (2018, background): “…on group oral tests and rater agreement indicated lower inter-rater correlations than those found in individual interview tests (e.g., Reves, 1981) and differences in severity between raters in group tests, even in the case of experienced and trained raters (Bonk & Ockey, 2003; van Moere, 2006).”
• The effects of group members' personalities on a test taker's L2 group oral discussion test scores (2009, background): “Bonk, W. J. & Van Moere, A. (2004, March).”
• Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance (2009, background): “Bonk, W. J., & Van Moere, A. (2002, December).”