A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace

By C. Rudolph, Charles L. Wells, M. Weller, B. Baltes. 2009

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Conservation, Pharmacy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1b13c7c8889091145df21e9f5145a956bd09cd3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Eisenberg
2. Connie R. Wanberg
3. R. Puhl
4. C. Apovian
5. Chelsea A. Heuer
6. Janet Tomiyama
7. Maria Vakola
8. Shaul Oreg

In Conservation

1. Connie R. Wanberg

In Pharmacy

1. Connie R. Wanberg
2. R. Puhl
3. C. Apovian
4. Chelsea A. Heuer
5. Janet Tomiyama
6. Chad D Meyerhoefer
7. J. Cawley

Citations in the corpus

• Experimental Research on Labor Market Discrimination (2018, unknown): “Rudolph et al. (2009) provide a similar type of meta-analysis of studies of discrimination against obese job applicants.”
• Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity (2020, background): “Workplace discrimination against individuals with overweight and obesity is common in high-income countries 58 .”
• The individual experience of unemployment. (2012, result): “This perception is supported by a recent metaanalysis that reported that overweight individuals receive lower recommendations for hire than nonoverweight individuals (d = −0.70, k = 31; Rudolph et al. 2009).”