Creativity across domains : faces of the muse

By James C. Kaufman, John Baer. 2005

276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e161222ffe2705a14d2b8311deff8b9bd27179bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Answering the Unexpected Questions: Exploring the Relationship Between Students' Creative Self-Efficacy and Teacher Ratings of Creativity (2011, background): “As noted earlier, however, there is evidence in creativity research for domain effects (Baer, 1993; Kaufman & Baer, 2005; Kaufman, Cole, & Baer, 2009).”
The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains (2011, background): “The domain-specific nature of creativity correlates In a tentative domain-specificity model of creativity resulting from the review of many studies, Kaufman and Baer (2005) argued for the existence of general requirements at a global level, but also of specific requirements that may vary across…”
The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity (2015, background): “Under this model, the more narrowly one defines a domain, the more shared variance there is within that domain (Baer & Kaufman, 2005; Kaufman & Baer, 2005).”
CREATIVE COMBINATION OF REPRESENTATIONS: SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY AND TECHNOLOGICAL INVENTION (2010, background): “STUDY 2: TECHNOLOGICAL INVENTION Previous investigation based on a few examples have suggested that invention of new technologies involves the same basic set of cognitive processes of scientific discovery (Saunders and Thagard, 2005; Thagard and Croft, 1999).”
Differential Effects of Divergent Thinking, Domain Knowledge, and Interest on Creative Performance in Art and Math (2011, background): “Even though a recent volume on creativity implies that we need to differentiate general motivation and domainspecific motivation (Kaufman & Baer, 2005), a clear conceptualization of domain-specific motivation has not been suggested, especially with regard to the domainspecific nature of creativity.”
Assessing General Creativity and Creative Engineering Design in First Year Engineering Students (2009, background): “…by the person, process, product, and environment (Clapham, 2001; Sternberg, 1999) and conceptualization of necessary creative processes in engineering design (Cropley and Cropley, 2005; Finke, Ward, and Smith, 1992; Stokes, 2006) that are domain specific (Kaufman and Baer, 2005; Nickerson, 1999).”
Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas? (2008, methodology): “Multilevel modeling can simultaneously estimate within-person and between-person effects, thereby accounting for the interdependence of the observations (Hox, 2002; Silvia, 2007).”
Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity (2005, background): “…Journal asked two leading proponents of these competing positions to debate the question of domain specificity versus generality (Baer, 1998; Plucker, 1998), and just this year two new books have been released focusing on this issue (Kaufman & Baer, 2005a; Sternberg, Grigorenko, & Singer, 2004).”
The Construct of Creativity: Structural Model for Self‐Reported Creativity Ratings (2009, background): “One theory that focuses explicitly on creativity across domains is the Amusement Park Theoretical Model (APT Model; Baer & Kaufman, 2005; Kaufman & Baer, 2005a, 2005b, 2006).”
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity: A Critical Review (2011, background): “Creativity research has concluded that creative performance is due to both domain general and domain specific components, with the majority due to domain specific components (Kaufman & Baer, 2005).”