Measurements and Effects of Social-Value Orientation in Social Dilemmas: A Review.

By W. Au, Jessica Y. Y. Kwong. 2004

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0ecaf6fc6d4e90e2bbe8f6eee1aad3465e8098a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Social Value Orientation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis (2009, background): “A recent review on SVO by Au and Kwong (2004) suggests that most people are classified as cooperators (46%), followed by individualists (38%), followed by competitors (12%).”
How can we promote behaviour that serves all of us in the future (2008, background): “%) adopt a cooperative orientation in dilemma type settings even when there is no strategic reason to do so (e.g., no anticipated future interaction) (Au & Kwong, 2004).”
Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering (2011, methodology): “Research using this instrument, reveals that most individuals are classified as prosocial (50–60%), followed by individualists (30–40%), while competitors is the smallest group (8–15%), although such percentages differ somewhat per sample (see Au & Kwong, 2004; Van Lange et al., 1997).”
Social Value Orientation, Expectations, and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta–Analysis (2018, background): “…studies always contain very few individuals who dispositionally pursue relative gains over others (i.e. competitors, about 12% of the population; Au & Kwong, 2004; Van Lange et al., 1997), and a meta-analysis can provide a relatively high-powered test whether competitors differ from the more…”
Who syncs? Social motives and interpersonal coordination (2012, result): “This distribution is very much in line with previous research (see Au & Kwong, 2004).”
Who is James Bond?: The Dark Triad as an Agentic Social Style (2010, unknown): “Last, we assessed social value orientation (Au & Kwong, 2001).”