Social status as a cue for tacit coordination

By E. W. Kwaadsteniet, Eric van Dijk. 2010

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0c7f8d44e42f00a33bf7de4b0b05ec6177bf321

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. Andrew P. Knight
2. Aparna Joshi

In Social Psychology

1. Andrew P. Knight
2. Silvia Collado
3. J. A. Corraliza
4. H. Staats
5. Aparna Joshi
6. D. van Knippenberg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Silvia Collado
2. J. A. Corraliza
3. H. Staats
4. Andrew P. Knight
5. Aparna Joshi
6. Sabirah Adams
7. Shazly Savahl
8. Xinran Y. Lehto

Citations in the corpus

• Who Defers to Whom and Why? Dual Pathways Linking Demographic Differences and Dyadic Deference to Team Effectiveness (2015, background): “Bio-photonics laboratory leader, interview excerpt Within teams performing complex mutually interdependent tasks, a fundamental process by which team members gain access to and capitalize on one another’s expertise is deference—yielding to one another’s opinions, beliefs, and decisions in the…”
• Experiencing nature in children's summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences (2013, background): “The size of the indirect effect in at least 95% (confident intervals with a significant level a ¼ .05) of the re-samples should be either above or below 0 in order to conclude that there is a significant indirect effect (see e.g. De Kwaadsteniet & Van Dijk, 2010).”