Documented and Potential Biological Impacts of Recreational Fishing: Insights for Management and Conservation

By Wolf-Christian Lewin, Robert Arlinghaus, Thomas Mehner. 2006

690 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0255a977c33595f7d58668c0b9a59cf5bfd3ceb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Cooke
2. Robert Arlinghaus
3. A. Danylchuk
4. M. Donaldson
5. C. Suski
6. Ulf Dieckmann
7. K. Hanson
8. D. Philipp

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Cooke
2. Robert Arlinghaus
3. A. Danylchuk
4. M. Donaldson
5. C. Suski
6. K. Hanson
7. Ulf Dieckmann
8. D. Philipp

Citations in the corpus

• Selection for Vulnerability to Angling in Largemouth Bass (2009, neutral): “This lack of effort is somewhat surprising because large-scale recreational fisheries also have the potential to produce substantial selective effects (Cooke and Cowx 2006; Lewin et al. 2006).”
• Enhancing catch‐and‐release science with biotelemetry (2008, background): “Over-exploitation from anglers may lead to population or ecosystem-level consequences (Cooke and Cowx 2006; Lewin et al. 2006).”
• Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model (2010, background): “The lack of sustainable recreationalfisheries management in some areas of the world (Post et al. 2002; Lewin et al. 2006) suggests that current management strategies have not always been successful in achieving this balance.”
• The conservation and fishery benefits of protecting large pike Esox lucius L. by harvest regulations in recreational fishing (2010, background): “However, it is only recently that fishing mortality exerted by recreational fishing has been identified as contributing to fish stock declines (Post et al., 2002; Lewin et al., 2006).”
• A mechanistic understanding of hyperstability in catch per unit effort and density-dependent catchability in a multistock recreational fishery (2013, background): “2011), and increasing evidence suggests that similar outcomes could be seen for recreational fisheries (Coleman et al. 2004; Lewin et al. 2006; Hilborn and Hilborn 2012).”
• Wrasse (Labridae) as cleaner fish in salmonid aquaculture – The Hardangerfjord as a case study (2014, background): “Lewin et al. (2006) reported that fishing which selectively exploits larger fish is the major factor in reducing female mean size.”
• Recovery bags reduce post-release impairments in locomotory activity and behavior of bonefish (Albula spp.) following exposure to angling-related stressors☆ (2013, methodology): “Jason Thiem , data analysis, and manuscript ed in the experimentation, and rimental design, conducted the k developed the experimental Brownscombe). rights reserved. which could contribute to population level declines (Cooke and Schramm, 2007; Lewin et al., 2006).”
• The metabolic and biochemical basis of vulnerability to recreational angling after three generations of angling-induced selection in a teleost fish (2010, background): “…fishing, recreational angling can also be highly selective for size, species, and sex, but in addition, a suite of physiological and behavioural traits may be under equal or stronger selection pressures than those related to body size (reviewed in Lewin et al. 2006; Uusi-Heikkilä et al. 2008).”
• Competition for the fish – fish extraction from the Baltic Sea by humans, aquatic mammals, and birds (2018, neutral): “With recreational fishing as a fast growing component of the tourism-industry, increasing fishing pressure must be expected also on other species than those targeted by commercial fisheries (Coleman et al., 2004; Lewin et al., 2006; Ihde et al., 2011).”
• Fish life history, angler behaviour and optimal management of recreational fisheries (2013, neutral): “Similarly, recreational fisheries can also have substantial negative impacts on the world's fisheries (McPhee et al. 2002; Coleman et al. 2004; Cooke and Cowx 2004; Lewin et al. 2006), although they often remain 'invisible' because of absent or insufficient monitoring (Post et al. 2002).”
• Recreational angler satisfaction: What drives it? (2021, background): “…published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd The fact that millions of recreational anglers exploit natural ecosystems around the world suggests that a range of social, economic, ecological and evolutionary impacts is associated with the practice (Ditton et al., 2002; Lewin et al., 2006; Tufts et al., 2015).”
• Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots (2015, background): “To protect fish stocks from overfishing and meet ecological and social objectives, length-based management is common (Radomski et al. 2001; Lewin et al. 2006).”