The conservation and fishery benefits of protecting large pike Esox lucius L. by harvest regulations in recreational fishing

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing evolutionary consequences of size-selective recreational fishing on multiple life-history traits, with an application to northern pike (Esox lucius) (2011, unknown): “In addition to MinL-Ls, we therefore considered maximum-length limits (MaxL-Ls) and harvestable-slot length limits (HSL-Ls), with the latter being designed to protect immature and large fish simultaneously (Arlinghaus et al. 2010).”
Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots (2015, background): “…maternal effects on offspring performance as demonstrated previously for a range of species (e.g. Berkeley et al. 2004b; Venturelli et al. 2009; Arlinghaus et al. 2010) and therefore likely produced predictions of harvest and catch lower than would be expected for HSs applied to stocks that…”