Enhancing catch‐and‐release science with biotelemetry

By M. Donaldson, Robert Arlinghaus, K. Hanson, S. Cooke. 2008

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79fca97c6e9e5250dca38104239122b5a40eadee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Cooke
2. S. Hinch
3. A. Danylchuk
4. D. Patterson
5. M. Donaldson
6. G. Raby
7. A. Farrell
8. Robert Arlinghaus

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Cooke
2. S. Hinch
3. D. Patterson
4. M. Donaldson
5. G. Raby
6. A. Danylchuk
7. A. Farrell
8. Robert Arlinghaus

Citations in the corpus

• The role of temperature in the capture and release of fish (2013, background): “…specific study animals and choosing study designs with appropriate control and sham treatments and adequate statistical power; Cooke et al. 2011), effects should be minimal and the benefits in terms of data collected are immense (Bridger and Booth 2003; Cooke et al. 2004b; Donaldson et al. 2008a).”
• The physiological consequences of catch‐and‐release angling: perspectives on experimental design, interpretation, extrapolation and relevance to stakeholders (2013, methodology): “For example, innovations in biotelemetry and biologging (reviewed in Donaldson et al. 2008) as well as validation of portable diagnostic meters (e.g. for lactate, haemoglobin, blood gases, glucose, ions; e.g. Mandelman & Farrington 2007; Clark et al. 2008; Cooke et al. 2008; Gallagher et al. 2010)…”
• The consequences of angling, beach seining, and confinement on the physiology, post-release behaviour and survival of adult sockeye salmon during upriver migration (2011, background): “Recently, there has been a call for more experimental and integrative approaches to catch-and-release research, particularly for studies that use telemetry as a tool to assess behaviour and survival (Donaldson et al., 2008).”
• The understudied and underappreciated role of predation in the mortality of fish released from fishing gears (2014, background): “Research studies evaluating mortality that include long-term monitoring and sublethal endpoints of fish released into the wild are far fewer, despite the fact that their findings are more robust (Cooke and Schramm 2007; Donaldson et al. 2008).”
• Recovery bags reduce post-release impairments in locomotory activity and behavior of bonefish (Albula spp.) following exposure to angling-related stressors☆ (2013, background): “Indeed, the duration of a stressful event increases the level of physiological disturbance in bonefish (Suski et al., 2007; Donaldson et al., 2008), while longer handling times and air exposure durations result in higher post-release predation rates (Danylchuk et al., 2007a).”
• The Use of Electronic Tags in Fish Research - An Overview of Fish Telemetry Methods (2013, unknown): “Radio tagging and other telemetry methods have been used in a number of studies to assess mortality rates, behavioural impairments, or to evaluate the effects of displacement on fish after catch-and-release (reviewed by Donaldson et al., 2008).”
• Physiological and behavioural consequences of catch-and-release angling on northern pike (Esox lucius L.) (2009, unknown): “, 1997) and thus are particularly suitable as an integrative measure to study the sub-lethal impacts of C&R angling (Donaldson et al., 2008).”
• Making connections in aquatic ecosystems with acoustic telemetry monitoring (2014, methodology): “However, novel approaches in experimental design (eg comparative treatment groups; Donaldson et al. 2008) and more robust statisti-”
• Freshwater Commercial Bycatch: An Understated Conservation Problem (2011, background): “Further, there has been extensive research into the effects of discarding in freshwater recreational fisheries (i.e., catch and release), generating considerable understanding of the survival rates and behavior of discarded fish (Cooke and Wilde 2007, Donaldson et al. 2008).”
• Advancing the surgical implantation of electronic tags in fish: a gap analysis and research agenda based on a review of trends in intracoelomic tagging effects studies (2011, background): “Indeed, electronic tagging, and telemetry in particular, are regarded as effective means of quantifying postrelease mortality rates for fish that are captured and released by anglers ( Donaldson et al. 2008 ), so it is not surprising that these techniques are also relevant to evaluating effects of t”
• Cold shock and fish (2008, background): “…endpoints; however, there is a growing body of field research that combines approaches from multiple disciplines through the integration of biosampling to non-invasively assess physiological indices and biotelemetry to assess fish behaviour and survival (Cooke et al., 2005; Donaldson et al., 2008).”
• Validation of reflex indicators for measuring vitality and predicting the delayed mortality of wild coho salmon bycatch released from fishing gears (2012, background): “The use of biotelemetry in recreational fisheries (mostly freshwater) has been relatively common, whereas in bycatch research (mostly marine) it has been rare, owing to technological ⁄ logistical limitations and prohibitive costs (Donaldson et al. 2008).”
• Looking beyond the mortality of bycatch: sublethal effects of incidental capture on marine animals (2014, background): “…mortality (especially immediate mortality at time of landing or haul back) is also relatively easy to observe – at least to the extent that it has regularly been measured in a variety of contexts (e.g., using biotelemetry or net pen holding – see Donaldson et al., 2008; Yergey et al., 2012).”