Spatializing Quality: Regional Protection and the Alternative Geography of Food

By N. Parrott, N. Wilson, J. Murdoch. 2002

374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Food Science, Plant Science, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ded2f846ccaee38da5b3bd7139e77cfdd2b11f63

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Food Science

1. A. Tregear
2. D. Maye
3. B. Ilbery
4. G. Belletti
5. A. Marescotti
6. O. Schutter

In Plant Science

1. A. Tregear
2. D. Maye
3. B. Ilbery
4. G. Belletti
5. D. Watts
6. G. Walker
7. Christopher Bear
8. Dimitris Skuras

In Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

1. D. Maye
2. B. Ilbery
3. A. Tregear

Citations in the corpus

• Making reconnections in agro-food geography: alternative systems of food provision (2005, background): “As the following summary of these two uses demonstrates, ‘quality’ is difficult both to define and theorize (Parrott et al., 2002: 243).”
• Consumers' and producers' expectations towards geographical indications Empirical evidence for a German case study (2011, background): “A similar reasoning is put forward by Parrott et al. (2002).”
• Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural – between place and space (2015, background): “This approach to farming treats farm products as largely homogeneous and generic with limited connection between the place of production and the characteristics of the product (Goodman, 2003; Parrott et al., 2002).”
• Consumer demand for informative labeling of quality food and drink products: a European Union case study (2005, background): “These three schemes for the production of quality food were successfully established in 1992 as part of EU's rural development policy ( Parrot et al. , 2002”
• Geographical indications, terroir, and socioeconomic and ecological sustainability: The case of tequila (2009, neutral): “Although an emerging body of literature has documented the theoretical benefits of GI protection and the ways in which GIs constitute ‘‘short food supply chains’’ (Renting et al 2003), very little empirical research has considered the inequalities in the distribution of costs and benefits of GI prot”
• Alternative (Shorter) Food Supply Chains and Specialist Livestock Products in the Scottish–English Borders (2005, background): “Thus, Ilbery and Maye (2005) emphasise the importance of `hybrid spaces', and thereby suggest that there is no straightforward division between production for local and nonlocal markets, nor between quality food and conventional food.”
• Understanding and (dis)trusting food assurance schemes: Consumer confidence and the ‘knowledge fix’ (2008, background): “…focused upon geographical assurances about the region of origin and, hence, authenticity of the product (e.g. Ilbery and Kneafsey, 2000; Parrott et al., 2002), despite Tregear et al. (1998, p. 392) finding that consumer awareness of such schemes was low and that these designations were…”
• Regional foods and rural development: The role of product qualification (2007, background): “Whilst qualification processes have been theorised as representations of the shifting moral and ethical conventions of societies (Busch, 2000; Parrott et al., 2002), and as instruments constructed by powerful actors to be wielded in geopolitical negotiations (Moran, 1993; Barham, 2003), at the…”