University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence

By Aldo Geuna, L. Nesta. 2006

684 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de8bd1a58531527d49b0abac0f0bc5471827bce6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting (2010, background): “Previous work (Geuna and Nesta, 2006) has pointed out the scarce availability of statistical information on academic patenting in Europe, the situation has much improved since then, but it is still far from optimal.”
Patents and patent policy (2007, background): “Although the impact and importance of this Act remains controversial in the United States (e. g., see Mowery et al. , 2004), it has been seen as a model by many other countries who are anxious to improve their record of commercializing university research and a number of them have experimented with ”
Patent and Publication Activities of German Professors: An Empirical Assessment of Their Co-Activity (2007, background): “Geuna and Nesta (2006) and Verspagen (2006) provide surveys on university patenting under the different innovation systems in Europe.”
WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS (2007, background): “…ISSN 1043-8599 print; ISSN 1476-8364 online © 2007 Taylor & Francis DOI: 10.1080/10438590600982806 72 P. E. STEPHAN et al. and Thursby, 2002; 2004; Geuna and Nesta, 2003; Siegel et al., 2003; Lach and Schankerman, 2004; Murray and Stern, 2005).1 These studies provide important insight into…”
Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities (2013, positive): “…R&D funding could also have a positive impact due to complementarity or signalling effects” (Blume-Kohout et al., 2009, p. 30 Moreover, according to Geuna and Nesta (2006) the reduction in structural (government) funds would produce great ﬁnancial difﬁculties for most universities while beneﬁting…”
Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer (2013, neutral): “Also, during the period immediately surrounding the passage of the Bayh-Dole Act, technological advances in biomedical areas, molecular biology, computer technology, and other sciences became increasingly prominent in university research (Colyvas et al., 2002; Geuna and Nesta, 2006).”
University Patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What Role Did the Professors' Privilege Play? (2012, background): “Yet the hope for revenues from commercialization as a new source of funding for universities could be misguided anyway: patent earnings are highly skewed and the experience shows that most TTOs in the USA and UK are not profitable (Geuna and Nesta, 2006; Heher, 2006).”
Industry Funding of University Research and Scientific Productivity (2011, neutral): “, the Bayh-Dole Act of 1981 was the major reform, whereas in Europe, policy acts had been installed two decades later (Mowery et al. 2001, Mowery and and Ziedonis 2002; Sampat 2006; and for surveys on the legislative changes and developments in ownership of academic patents in Europe see Verspagen 2”
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “…have been introduced in Europe concerning universities’ use of intellectual property (IP) (Mowery & Sampat, 2005), although these reforms have been introduced against a backdrop of limited research evidence on the impacts, benefits and risks of IP exploitation by universities (Geuna & Nesta, 2006).”
Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model (2009, methodology): “value and having these used by industry (e.g., Geiger 2004; Mowery and Sampat 2001;”
The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions (2012, background): “Cuts in university budgets in the 1980s and 1990s increased the need to acquire complementary funding and, hence, spurred universityindustry collaboration and the general interest of European academics in commercialization (Geuna and Nesta 2006).”