Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting

By Geuna Aldo, Rossi Federica. 2010

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bb5c1582a1b43eee2963a1745d975c97a16ded1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions (2013, background): “…the discussion of how European countries have implemented Bayh-Dole act-like regulations for institutional ownership of academic patents partly on the basis of an incomplete evaluation of the patenting output of European universities (Geuna and Rossi, 2011). are either allowed or tolerated to do.”
Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society (2013, background): “First, there is the (neo-) institutional perspective, which examines the growing prominence of the university among innovation actors through national and regional case studies (for example, in Latin America: Mello and Rocha, 2004; Etzkowitz, Mello and Almeida, 2005; Saenz, 2008; Bianco and Viscardi”
Chinese university patents: quantity, quality, and the role of subsidy programs (2014, unknown): “Our paper aims to contribute to the literature on the role of governmental initiatives regarding university patenting (e.g., Henderson et al. 1998; Mowery et al. 2002; Geuna and Nesta 2006; Wong and Singh 2010; Geuna and Rossi 2011; Hülsbeck et al. 2013) in two ways.”
The Effectiveness of University Knowledge Spillovers: Performance Differences between University Spinoffs and Corporate Spinoffs (2011, background): “With the US leading the way, similar efforts have been pursued around the world (see Guena and Rossi, 2011, this issue).”
Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study (2016, background): “…Act in the USA (Mowery et al. 2001) and to boost technology transfer activities from public research institutions, several EU countries revoked the so-called professor’s privilege, which granted IPR on employees’ inventions not to the employer but to the employees themselves (Geuna and Rossi 2011).”