The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior

By John T. Jost. 2017

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de8ab8290d01257f8968fb5643d3abcca255018a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. P. Briñol
2. Nathan P. Kalmoe
3. Richard E. Petty

In Social Psychology

1. Richard E. Petty
2. P. Briñol
3. J. Teeny
4. Joseph J. Siev
5. Nathan P. Kalmoe
6. Zakary L. Tormala
7. Derek D. Rucker
8. Bertram Gawronski

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Briñol
2. Richard E. Petty
3. J. Teeny
4. Joseph J. Siev
5. Nathan P. Kalmoe
6. Zakary L. Tormala
7. Derek D. Rucker
8. Bertram Gawronski

Citations in the corpus

• Uses and Abuses of Ideology in Political Psychology (2020, background): “…Jost, Goslin, & Potter, 2008; Duckitt & Sibley, 2010; Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009; Hibbing, Smith, & Alford, 2014; Inbar, Pizarro, & Bloom, 2008; Jost, 2017a, 2017b; Jost, Banaji, & Nosek, 2004; Jost, Federico, & Napier, 2009; Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003; Napier & Jost, 2008;…”
• A Review and Conceptual Framework for Understanding Personalized Matching Effects in Persuasion (2020, background): “The bases of individuals’ attitudes can also differ as a function of their political liberalism/conservatism, where each ideology tends to correspond to different underlying values (Jost, 2017; Janoff-Bulman, 2009).”