Forced Choice Restriction in Promoting Sustainable Food Consumption: Intended and Unintended Effects of the Mandatory Vegetarian Day in Helsinki Schools
By Chiara Lombardini, Leena Lankoski. 2013
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Food Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de0f4b5e5f140472f05e62329d7609347437a29a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Food Science
- J. Aschemann‐Witzel
- Gisel Bejjani
- C. Lemmer
- T. Bech-Larsen
- D. Marshall
- Pegah Amani
- I. D. Hooge
- Christian Schubert
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action (2015, background): “Findings on consumer behavior in food service environments indicate that changes in the food offered (introducing vegetarian meals) can lead to increased food waste for a period of time [29].”
- Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical? (2016, background): “Nudges in this domain may be superior to mandatory measures, as Lombardini and Lankoski (2013) show: 16 Bolderdijk et al. (2013) present field-experimental evidence that in the context of energy conservation by regular tire pressure checks appeals to ‘biospheric’ concerns are more effective than…”
- ‘Nudging’ as an architect of more responsible consumer choice in food service provision: The role of restaurant menu design (2017, background): “This is because customer choice restriction as a policy intervention instrument has a number of disadvantages and may even lead to public opposition (Lombardini and Lankoski 2013) which implies it should be employed with care.”