Variation in the frequency and characteristics of incidental focus on form
By S. Loewen. 2003
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc317bad07173fbb2f7659e01e5ab32a43707839
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Masatoshi Sato
- Younghee Sheen
- S. Loewen
- Hossein Nassaji
- Dan Brown
- Alison Mackey
- Kim McDonough
- R. Lyster
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings (2004, background): “As Loewen (2003) reports from his investigation of L2 communicative classrooms, there can be a great deal of teacher and learner variation in CF within a single setting, with corresponding differences in the effects on learning.”
- INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING (2005, background): “This research is part of a larger study investigating the occurrence and effectiveness of incidental focus on form ~Loewen, 2002, 2003, 2004!+ The current paper examines the relationship between incidental focus on form and L2 learning, as operationalized by the individualized testing+”
- The relationship between experience, education and teachers’ use of incidental focus-on-form techniques (2004, background): “…empirical support, for the benefits of specific types of reactive focus on form, such as recasts (e.g., Doughty and Varela, 1998; Leeman, 2003; Han, 2002; Mackey and Philp, 1998), negotiation (e.g., Pica, 1994; Mackey, 1999) and pre-emptive focus on form (e.g., Ellis et al., 2001; Loewen, 2003).”
- Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018, background): “For example, Loewen (2003) observed that not all students in his New Zealand ESL classes participated equally in FFEs.”
- The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis (2016, background): “This finding spurred interest in the relationship between these and other feedback moves found in classroom interaction (Ellis et al., 2001; Loewen, 2003; Lyster, 1998; Miller & Pan, 2012; Panova & Lyster, 2002; Sheen, 2004, 2006).”