The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input–output model

By Angela Druckman, Tim Jackson. 2009

589 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc26467789fb5812377cd28d48e8f115d0202849

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. T. Wiedmann
2. G. P. Peters
3. Manfred Lenzen
4. D. Guan
5. Richard Wood
6. Klaus Hubacek
7. Robbie M. Andrew
8. E. Dietzenbacher

In Environmental Engineering

1. T. Wiedmann
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. G. P. Peters
4. D. Guan
5. Richard Wood
6. Klaus Hubacek
7. Robbie M. Andrew
8. E. Dietzenbacher

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. T. Wiedmann
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. G. P. Peters
4. D. Guan
5. Klaus Hubacek
6. Richard Wood
7. J. Barrett
8. J. Minx

Citations in the corpus

• Energy, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: Five Propositions (2010, background): “example, official figures indicate a 5% reduction in the UK’s carbon emissions between 1990 and 2004, but this changes to a 15% increase when the emissions embodied in international trade are accounted for [57].”
• Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households' home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions (2013, methodology): “These limitations are discussed in more depth elsewhere (e.g. Baiocchi et al., 2010; Druckman and Jackson, 2009; Minx et al., 2009).”
• Transforming Consumption: From Decoupling, to Behavior Change, to System Changes for Sustainable Consumption (2015, background): “As one very small piece of this, the use of territorial-based emissions accounting in international agreements has allowed developed economies to claim decreased emissions intensities when reductions mainly resulted from the off-shoring of carbon-intensive industries (11).”
• Living up to expectations: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households (2015, background): “The latter, in turn can be derived from environmentally extended, multiregional input-output models (Druckman and Jackson, 2009; Turner et al., 2007; Wiedmann et al., 2007).”
• Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework (2013, background): “These studies use environmentally extended input – output (EEIO) analysis (Leontief, 1970) and show that over half of household CF can be attributed to non-energy goods and services for the case of the Netherlands (Biesiot and Noorman, 1999), Sweden (Carlsson-Kanyama et al., 2005), the U.S. (Weber a”
• A CARBON FOOTPRINT TIME SERIES OF THE UK – RESULTS FROM A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL (2010, methodology): “A similar trend is observed by Druckman and Jackson (2009) for the carbon footprint of UK households. In this work, the authors relax the domestic technology assumption in their previous study (Druckman et al., 2008) by deriving different carbon dioxide intensity coefficients of imported products.(1”
• Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation (2011, unknown): “Druckman and Jackson (2009) classified the selected households in UK according to their socioeconomic status through Local Area Resource Analysis model, based on the input data of expenditure, fuel use, and census.”
• Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Chinese urban households (2012, unknown): “A growing body of literature is addressing this problem — see for example, Weber and Matthews (2008) and Druckman and Jackson (2009) — but it falls beyond the scope of this paper to deal with it here. meters, cultural and of fi ce equipment sector each have indirect emissions that are more than 100…”
• Household carbon inequality in the U.S. (2021, background): “Assessing energy use and emissions associated with household consumption has received considerable attention in environmental sustainability and climate research due to the significant emissions from households and their supply chain effects triggered through consumption choices (Druckman and Jackso”
• Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies (2011, background): “For indirect emissions comprise a considerable share of households’ overall emissions, in some cases more than 50% (Druckman and Jackson, 2009: 2074; Reinders et al., 2003) whilst overall expenditure including consumer goods generally increases less than proportionally with income (see, for…”
• Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households (2010, methodology): “The rationale for these categories is explained in Druckman and Jackson (2009b).”
• APPROXIMATION AND REGIONAL AGGREGATION IN MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR NATIONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT ACCOUNTING (2009, methodology): “…used where no foreign data are available, but it can be extended if world (or a representative country’s) emission intensities (F2) are known (e.g. Druckman and Jackson, 2009).8 Those intensities are then used in combination with the domestic IOT 8 Druckman and Jackson (2009) call this a…”