Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Chinese urban households

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Overview of research on China's transition to low-carbon development: The role of cities, technologies, industries and the energy system (2018, background): “The household level has become a hot topic in recent years and includes both direct energy consumption and GHG emissions [26,27] and indirect types of material consumption and emissions [105,118,141,143].”
Household carbon emission research: An analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects (2015, unknown): “Golley and Meng (2012), for example, suggest that more educated households in China are more aware of the adverse consequences (health and environmental) of direct energy consumption, especially in the use of coal, and are therefore more likely to adopt improved direct energy consumption patterns,…”
The role of education in the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Evidence from Australian data (2018, result): “While some of them obtain that redistributing income would have a beneficial effect (e.g., Golley and Meng, 2012; Baek and Gweisah, 2013), others find opposite or heterogeneous results in according different macroeconomic contexts (e.g., Brännlund and Ghalwash, 2008; Jorgenson et al., 2016).”