APPROXIMATION AND REGIONAL AGGREGATION IN MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR NATIONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT ACCOUNTING

By Robbie M. Andrew, G. P. Peters, J. Lennox. 2009

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f49044331325c1a6cd92cf0207e7853320546a81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. G. P. Peters
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. T. Wiedmann
4. Edgar G. Hertwich
5. D. Guan
6. Richard Wood
7. E. Dietzenbacher
8. Klaus Hubacek

In Environmental Engineering

1. Manfred Lenzen
2. T. Wiedmann
3. G. P. Peters
4. D. Guan
5. Richard Wood
6. Edgar G. Hertwich
7. E. Dietzenbacher
8. Robbie M. Andrew

Citations in the corpus

• CALCULATING ENERGY-RELATED CO2 EMISSIONS EMBODIED IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE USING A GLOBAL INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL (2012, methodology): “Lenzen et al. (2004) and Andrew et al. (2009) differentiate between three cases or stages of multi-regional pollution analysis using input–output models: (1) Unilateral trade, using domestic CO2 intensities for all imports (2) Unilateral trade, different CO2 intensities of imports according to…”
• A synthesis of carbon in international trade (2012, methodology): “The dataset and method has been applied in several peer-reviewed publications (Peters and Hertwich, 2008b; Hertwich and Peters, 2009; Andrew et al., 2009; Peters et al., 2011b).”
• The “Bad Labor” Footprint: Quantifying the Social Impacts of Globalization (2014, background): “This represents an inherent imprecision to the model, for which the contribution has not yet been quantified in terms of the effects on impacts embodied in trade [64–68].”
• GLOBAL MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT FRAMEWORKS: AN INTRODUCTION AND OUTLOOK (2013, background): “Peters and Hertwich, 2006; Andrew et al., 2009).”
• Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation (2011, methodology): “This technique has been used to calculate emissions related with exports and imports, and is technically termed as ‘multiregional input–output analysis’ ( Robbie et al. 2009 ).”
• Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK (2013, methodology): “Andrew et al (2009) focus on this type of error in their analysis based on the GTAP dataset.”
• A CARBON FOOTPRINT TIME SERIES OF THE UK – RESULTS FROM A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL (2010, background): “† Er Row vector of GHG emissions by industry in country/region r C A R B O N F O O T P R IN T T IM E S E R IE S 2 5 trade feedback loops will not have a major impact on total emission estimates (Lenzen et al., 2004), especially when the number of regions in the model is small (Andrew et al., 2009).”
• China’s provincial CO2 emissions embodied in international and interprovincial trade (2012, background): “It should be pointed out that ‘‘DTA’’ will cause an overestimation of CO2 emissions embodied in imports, for China has higher carbon intensity than that of supplying regions (Andrew et al., 2009).”
• Responsibility and trade emission balances: An evaluation of approaches (2010, background): “…countries: Peters and Hertwich (2008a) analyzed CO2 emissions embodied in international trade; Wilting and Vringer (2009) also included CH4, N2O and land use; Hertwich and Peters (2009) compared carbon footprints; and Andrew et al. (2009) quantified errors induced by applying different assumptions.”
• AGGREGATION VERSUS DISAGGREGATION IN INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENT (2011, unknown): “In their study on regional aggregation, Andrew et al. (2009) found that in constructing an MRIO, modelling a Rest-of-World (RoW) region on the basis of many countries’ input–output tables is preferable to choosing a ‘representative’ country. extended Multi-Region IO models by Blair and Miller…”