Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework

By B. Thomas, Inês Lima Azevedo. 2013

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e3ba7ecc40f54bfbac1ee10faf95ac08d17e02d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

A new approach to measuring the rebound effect associated to energy efficiency improvements: An application to the US residential energy demand (2015, background): “The literature has identified large positive as well as negative values for the indirect rebound effect, as found in Thomas and Azevedo (2013) for the household case.”
Income inequality and carbon consumption: Evidence from Environmental Engel curves (2019, methodology): “For example, Weber and Matthews (2008) construct measures of household carbon footprint (HCF) based on expenditure data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey in the United States.”
Forecasting the Impact of Connected and Automated Vehicles on Energy Use: A Microeconomic Study of Induced Travel and Energy Rebound (2019, background): “In keeping with an extensive literature on empirical rebound effects (see, for example [14,18,27]), we focus our analysis specifically on the marginal cost of VMT conditional on vehicle choice.”
Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse (2018, background): “For example, rebound effects from energy efficiency investments in households have been estimated to be 16–20% in the US (Thomas and Azevedo, 2013), 41–78% in the UK (Chitnis and Sorrell, 2015), and 22% in China (Lin et al., 2013).”
Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups (2014, background): “The exceptions areMurray (2013) who investigates rebound effects from both efficiency and sufficiency measures for different income groups in Australia, and Thomas and Azevedo (2013) who do the same for the US.”
A Microeconomic Framework for Evaluating Energy Efficiency Rebound and Some Implications (2013, background): “My contribution here is most closely related to the works of Binswanger (2000), Berkhout, Muskens and Velthuijsen (2000) and, more recently, Thomas and Azevedo (2013), in that they use a standard microeconomic frame and decompose energy use changes from an energy efﬁciency upgrade into income and…”
Household carbon emission research: An analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects (2015, unknown): “…Chitnis et al’s (2013) estimates of the rebound effects of 7 energy efficient measures in UK households range from 5% to 15% and mostly derive from indirect effects; while Thomas and Azevedo (2013) also estimate an indirect rebound of 5-15% in primary energy and CO 2 emissions for U.S. households.”