Understanding individual motivation in groups: The collective effort model.

By Steven J. Karau, Kipling D. Williams. 2001

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbd5b54d185f30ca0655fb466be025886a12640d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Emergence of New Project Teams from Open Source Software Developer Networks: Impact of Prior Collaboration Ties (2008, background): “An alternative explanation is offered based on expectancy value models (Karau and Williams 2000).”
Evaluating recommender systems from the user’s perspective: survey of the state of the art (2012, background): “One of the questions they asked was: if a user is not motivated to contribute ratings for her/his own sake, would s/he do it for the sake of the community? Karau and Williams (2001) developed a collective effort model (CEM) and identified some conditions under which people will contribute more to a ”
Sport Psychology: Contemporary Themes (2004, background): “‘Social exchange theory’, as initially developed Thibaut and Kelley (1959), was applied by Homans (1961) to explain how ageing individuals rearrange their activities so that their remaining energy generates maximum return.”
Are Consumers More Likely to Contribute Online Reviews for Hit or Niche Products? (2010, methodology): “Drawing on Karau and Williams’s [25] collective-action model, ling et al.”
Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research (2005, background): “…motivational processes of virtual team members can be conceptualized based on a model that integrates expectancy value concepts (e.g., Vroom, 1964; Karau & Williams, 2001) with research on social dilemmas that stress the importance of trust for the development of cooperation, particularly in…”
What Should we do About Motivation Theory? Six Recommendations for the Twenty-First Century (2004, background): “Social loafing is another potent group motivation phenomenon that is not part of extant work motivation theories (Karau & Williams, 2001).”
Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams (2004, methodology): “It builds on Expectancy 6 Value concepts that explain motivational processes in individual work (Atkinson, 1957; Vroom, 1964) as well as in more complex group settings (Karau & Williams, 2001; Shepperd, 1993).”
Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel (2003, methodology): “While related models of motivation in groups (e.g. Karau & Williams, 2000) assume a multiplicative function of at least some of these components, the VIST model refrains from such specifications since the empirical base is still too shallow.”