Communication Across the Curriculum and in the Disciplines: Speaking in Engineering

By Deanna Dannels. 2002

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Media Technology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dae759a67697c43c2190da210d4a6354be0a625a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Tara Kubicka-Miller
2. Norah E. Dunbar
3. Catherine Francis Brooks
4. Ann L. Darling

In Media Technology

1. Tara Kubicka-Miller
2. Norah E. Dunbar
3. Catherine Francis Brooks
4. Deanna Dannels
5. Ann L. Darling

In Social Psychology

1. Tara Kubicka-Miller
2. Norah E. Dunbar
3. Catherine Francis Brooks
4. Ann L. Darling
5. Judee K. Burgoon

Citations in the corpus

• Performing Tribal Rituals: A Genre Analysis of “Crits” in Design Studios (2005, methodology): “Based on a qualitative methodology, Dannels ( 2002 ) describes one oral genre in engineering and identifies five features of speaking competence in engineering design presentations.”
• Practicing Engineers Talk about the Importance of Talk: A Report on the Role of Oral Communication in the Workplace (2003, background): “Prior literature has identified translation as an important communication skill for engineers when speaking to a non-technical audience (Dannels, 2002).”
• Oral Communication Skills in Higher Education: Using a Performance-Based Evaluation Rubric to Assess Communication Skills (2006, methodology): “The rubric includes eight speaking competencies derived from the NCA’s standards including (Allen, 2002) choosing a topic; (Borko, 1997) communicating the purpose of the speech; (Dannels, 2001) using appropriate supporting materials; ( Dannels, 2002 ) organization; (Dougan, 1996) language use; (Erwi”