Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature

By Bruno H. Repp. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2005

1,404 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dad4c57904c14e51d5524d010c23dc01a67c0324

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Social Effects of Movement Synchrony: Increased Infant Helpfulness only Transfers to Affiliates of Synchronously Moving Partners (2016, background): “Because of our propensity to align our movements to underlying musical beats (Repp, 2005), moving together in time, known as”
Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012) (2013, background): “An earlier review (Repp, 2005) covered tapping studies; two additional reviews (Repp, 2006a, b) focused on music performance and on rate limits of SMS, respectively.”
The ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM) of sensorimotor synchronization (2013, background): “When listening to music, people generate temporal expectations based on structural regularities related to the musical beat (a periodic pulse), and they are often compelled to produce movements in synchrony with these regularities (Repp, 2005; Large, 2008).”
A Rhythmic Musical Intervention for Poor Readers: A Comparison of Efficacy With a Letter‐Based Intervention (2013, background): “Previous tapping literature has shown that nonmusicians tapping in synchrony with a metronome tend to tap before the stimulus (there is a negative mean asynchrony) (see Repp, 2005 for review).”
Joint Drumming in Brazilian and German Preschool Children (2014, background): “This approach emphasizes that human children inherit not only a species-typical genome from their parents but also a species-typical environment, manifested in the surrounding culture (Mesoudi, Whiten, & Laland, 2006; Richerson & Boyd, 2005).”
The Beat Alignment Test (BAT): Surveying beat processing abilities in the general population (2008, background): “The BAT falls within a tradition of measuring motor synchronization to auditory stimuli (Repp, 2005).”
Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review (2013, background): “…motion Freeman and Driver (2008); Chen et al. (2011) Finger tapping Auditory/visual dominance Clicks influence synchronization with flashes Aschersleben and Bertelson (2003); Repp (2005) TOJ/interval estimate Bayesian approach Less perfect quantitative fit Burr et al. (2009); Ley et al. (2009);”
Musical Rhythm, Linguistic Rhythm, and Human Evolution (2006, background): “See Gerhardt & Huber, 2002, ch.8, and Patel, Iversen, Chen, & Repp, 2005, for further discussion).”
Testing a Computational Model of Rhythm Perception Using Polyrhythmic Stimuli (2013, neutral): “(e) Connectivity of oscillators and number of net- works.”
Being Together in Time: Musical Experience and the Mirror Neuron System (2009, background): “…of humans to synchronize with a steady pulse has been demonstrated extensively under a variety of complex conditions (e.g., Large et al., 2002; Repp, 2005), with motor regions of the brain strongly implicated in the detection of pulse and metre (e.g., Grahn & Brett, 2007; Phillips-Silver &…”
Tagging the Neuronal Entrainment to Beat and Meter (2011, neutral): “, 2009), (2) because previous studies have shown that steady-state EPs require several cycles of stimulation to be steadily entrained (Regan, 1989), and (3) because previous studies have shown that several repetitions of the beat are required to elicit a steady perception of beat and meter (Repp, 20”