Doing good deeds in times of need: a strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations

By Allan Muller, Roman Kräussl. 2011

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d98b633b6836dc20dd4e436b8646324b2d743b43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate Social Performance: A Review of Empirical Research Examining the Corporation–Society Relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data (2017, result): “Another study supported this conclusion, finding that firms that had lost market value through prior corporate malfeasance were also more likely to engage in philanthropic giving (Muller & Kraussl, 2011).”
Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance: A Competitive-Action Perspective (2018, methodology): “Similarly, Muller and Kräussl (2011) reported that during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, firms with a reputation for social irresponsibility were associated with the greatest drop in stock prices.”
Determinants of Social Disclosure Quality in Taiwan: An Application of Stakeholder Theory (2014, methodology): “As to a proxy for the strategic posture variable, previous studies have used philanthropic activities (Roberts 1992; Muller and Kra¨ussl 2011), public affair ofﬁcers (Roberts 1992), or press releases (Magness 2006).”
Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda (2013, positive): “Despite this potential for social entrepreneurs, few academic articles exist so far that address CF in this context – apart for a small stream focusing solely on donations (Firth 2012; Muller and Kräussl 2011).”
From Doing Good to Looking Even Better: The Dynamics of CSR and Reputation (2019, background): “Referring to the enduring quality of reputation as sticky (Kraatz & Love, 2006; P. W. Roberts & Dowling, 2002) emphasizes the need to examine reputation’s change over time (Muller & Kräussl, 2011).”
Walking and Talking Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications of Firm Size and Organizational Cost (2016, neutral): “…for size but limit their sample to publicly listed ﬁrms (e.g., Adams and Hardwick, 1998; Brammer and Millington, 2006), to ﬁrms included in various sustainability rankings (e.g., Chiu and Sharfman, 2011; Russo and Fouts, 1997 or indexes such as the Fortune Global 500 (Muller and Kr € aussl, 2011).”
How CEO hubris affects corporate social (Ir)responsibility (2015, positive): “Though not without controversy (Shane and Spicer, 1983; Wright and Ferris, 1997), research suggests CSR significantly influences a firm’s long-term financial performance (Berman, Wicks, Kotha, and Jones, 1999; Lev, Petrovits, and Radhakrishnan, 2010; Muller and Kräussl, 2011; Waddock and Graves, 199”