An Ex Ante Evaluation Framework for the Regional Benefits of Publicly Supported R&D Projects

By S. Roper, Nola Hewitt-Dundas, J. Love. 2004

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d93632add7b47ad7f55c4816b1ff39f9661f285a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. P. Ganotakis
2. J. Love
3. S. Roper
4. J. Bourke
5. Jun Du
6. M. Kafouros
7. Chengqi Wang
8. Panagiotis Piperopoulos

In Political Science and International Relations

1. P. Ganotakis
2. J. Love
3. S. Roper
4. J. Bourke
5. Jun Du
6. Pierre Mohnen
7. W. Raymond
8. J. Foreman-Peck

Citations in the corpus

• Innovation, ownership and profitability (2009, background): “, 2005); and linkages to universities or other public research centres (Roper et al., 2004).”
• Evaluating the impact of public subsidies on a firm's performance: A quasi-experimental approach (2007, unknown): “…programs of technology diffusion in Switzerland, Lerner (1999) and Wallsten (2000), who examine the impact of the Small Business Innovation (SBIR) program in the US, and Roper et al. (2004) who, using an ex-ante qualitative exercise, study the private and social benefits of R+D projects for the UK.”
• Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: : The role of region-specific institutions (2015, background): “Institutions can have a profound effect on a country’s innovation system by determining infrastructure, the quality of human capital and the resources available for innovation (Bosker and Garretsen, 2009; Roper et al., 2004).”
• Learning by exporting: Lessons from high-technology SMEs (2013, background): “…or suppliers (Joshi and Sharma, 2004; Love and Mansury, 2007; Smith and Tranfield, 2005), horizontal linkages to competitors or other sectoral firms (Hemphill, 2003) and linkages to universities or other public research centres (Roper et al., 2004; Del Barrio-Castro and Garcia-Quevedo, 2005).”
• Innovation, quality management and learning: Short-term and longer-term effects (2017, background): “In line with previous studies, we find plant characteristics, such as R & D, linkages with suppliers, plant vintage, eternally-owned plants and an educated workforce, strongly impact on plant innovation (Roper et al., 2004; Roper et al., 2008; Freel, 2003).”
• Modelling the innovation value chain (2008, background): “and linkages to universities or other public research centres (Roper et al., 2004).”
• The innovation value chain (2006, background): “of knowledge linkages to universities or other public research centres (Roper et al., 2004).”