Training and development of human resources at work: Is the state of our science strong?

By Gilad Chen, R. Klimoski. 2007

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d806a8e0f84f548a75256b8bfb83f6283aedb79d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Michael J. Tews
2. Raymond A. Noe
3. Alison M. Dachner

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Raymond A. Noe
2. Michael J. Tews
3. Alison M. Dachner
4. Maribeth Kuenzi
5. David M. Mayer
6. Rebecca L. Greenbaum

In Strategy and Management

1. Raymond A. Noe
2. Alison M. Dachner

Citations in the corpus

• Learner Engagement: A New Perspective for Enhancing Our Understanding of Learner Motivation and Workplace Learning (2010, background): “Chen and Klimoski ( 2007 ) assessed the scientific rigor of training and development literature, providing welcome news that the state of the science is strong despite several gaps in the literature that need to be addressed related to the relationship between training antecedents, learning processe”