Reputation and Competition
By Johannes Hörner. 2002
364 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6be1d1fc223f4c3ffdb715de00bdc542e845cdc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Marcel Fafchamps
- B. Minten
- Qingmin Liu
- Jonathan D. Levin
- Larry Samuelson
- George J. Mailath
- Juan F. Escobar
- Juuso Toikka
In Finance
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Qingmin Liu
- Marcel Fafchamps
- Jonathan D. Levin
- Larry Samuelson
- George J. Mailath
- Yuliy Sannikov
- Juuso Toikka
- Juan F. Escobar
Citations in the corpus
- Quality control in nonstaple food markets: evidence from India (2008, background): “Limited observability is typically assumed to be solved through a reputation mechanism based on brand name and product recognition (e.g. Tadelis 1999, Horner 2002).”
- Who Wants a Good Reputation (2001, background): “For a model without replacements that has an equilibrium in which competent firms always choose high effort, see Hörner (1999).”
- The Economics of Solicited and Unsolicited Credit Ratings (2014, neutral): “For a more detailed account of this incident, see Klein (2004); additional anecdotal evidence of this practice can be found in Monroe (1987) and Schultz (1993).”
- How Did Increased Competition Affect Credit Ratings (2011, neutral): “Competition may enhance the effectiveness of the reputational mechanism if the existence of competitive choice is required to make the loss of reputation a real threat, as in Hörner (2002).”
- The Credit Ratings Game (2012, neutral): “This approach is taken in the context of …rms selling goods of varying qualities in Hörner (2002).”
- Relational Incentive Contracts (2003, background): “Hörner (2002), in a model in which purchasers are consumers, allows for both noise and privately-known persistent types but simplifies by having just two potential outcomes and suppliers of just two types.”
- Information Acquisition and Reputation Dynamics (2011, background): “By comparing (15) and (14), we have that the equality holds in (15).”