An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism

By P. Hall, D. Soskice. 2001

2,948 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6a9b3ed16fd1c4de0cfefbe8dd50339a5fbf976

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Public Administration

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Institutional legitimacy and norms-based CSR marketing practices: Insights from MNCs operating in a developing economy (2015, background): “This finding is consistent with recent theoretical arguments linking state, cultural, and social values to institutions, business systems, and corporate practice (Fligstein, 2001; Hall and Soskice, 2001; Redding, 2005).”
Review Article: Comparative Political Science and the Study of Education (2011, background): “…with political and economic institutions is the crucial factor explaining the divergent development paths of welfare state and production regimes (Hall & Soskice 2001; Iversen 2005; but see also Crouch & Streeck 1997; Hollingsworth & Boyer 1997; Estévez-Abe et al. 2001; Iversen & Soskice…”
Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments (2018, methodology): “Consequently, both employers and employees are assured that their investment in sophisticated, firm-specific skills will pay off (Hall and Soskice 2001: 25).”
Familial capitalism in global institutional contexts: Implications for corporate governance and entrepreneurship in East Asia (2009, background): “At the broadest level of differentiation, national economies fall into two categories— liberal market economies and coordinated market economies—distinguishing Anglo-America from the rest of the world ( Hall & Soskice, 2001 ).”
EMU and Labor Market Institutions in Europe (2005, background): “…two relevant dimensions: one is the nature of training and skills and the other some form of co-ordinated wage bargaining to avoid free riding and, therefore, lack of training (see Hall & Soskice, 2001, for the general point and Finegold & Soskice, 1988, for the specific version of that argument).”
Welfare States in Developing Countries: Unique or Universal? (2007, background): “See, for example, Hall and Soskice (2001).”
Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters, and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory (2013, methodology): “We structured our comparison around the key dimensions suggested in four major models of comparative institutional analysis: Whitley (1992, 1999); Hall and Soskice (2001), augmented by the critical evaluation by Hancké, Rhodes, and Thatcher (2007); Amable (2003); and Redding (2005).”
Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis of capitalism (2015, background): “Complementarities are also present in the theories of varieties of capitalism (Hall and Soskice, 2001), explaining the reinforcing mechanisms that lead to the emergence of two differentiated production systems, one based on the accumulation of speciﬁc skills and patient investment, the other…”
Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: Intersection in a macro-level perspective (2018, neutral): “Taking into account that contextual-institutional conditions strongly determine organizational behavior (Hall and Soskice, 2001; Judge et al ., 2008), policy-makers could endorse CSR penetration through the configuration on innovation-adapted CSR policies, devised around the creation of reward…”
Institutional change in economic geography (2014, background): “…between different countries, as the various rules, norms, conventions, habits, and technology attitudes that affect economic practices – and, thus, institutions – are often shaped by the settings negotiated at the level of the national state (Hall and Soskice, 2001; Lundvall and Maskell, 2000).”
Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey (2019, neutral): “US and UK) (Hall & Soskice, 2001; Hancke, Rhodes, & Thatcher, 2007).”
“Low‐Tech” Innovations (2008, background): “16 In a comparison of the national innovation systems, sectors such as the automotive industry and mechanical engineering are often deemed to be classic European or German examples for incremental innovations (cf. Caspar et al., 1999; Hollingsworth, 2000; Hall and Soskice, 2001).”