Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters, and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory

By Michael A. Witt, G. Redding. 2013

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3990fa7c5384e0326ae27fdd7eb3dd1a1c20d7b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research (2018, unknown): “The pairing of Korea and Taiwan is consistent with prior findings of similarities (Witt and Redding, 2013) on the back of similar paths of economic development drawing on developmental state policies (e.”
State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies (2020, background): “…2007; Schmidt, 2009), there is still a widespread sense, including amongst some of the key proponents of those approaches, that the role and diversity of state intervention are still underplayed in the CC scholarship (e.g. Wilkinson et al., 2014; Witt and Redding, 2013; Zhang and Whitley, 2013).”
Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality? (2014, methodology): “However, recent work has demonstrated that there can be a “multiplexity” of institutions operating within an economy (Witt & Redding, 2013).”
Corporate Social Responsibility Under Authoritarian Capitalism: Dynamics and Prospects of State-Led and Society-Driven CSR (2017, background): “…in China for the skeptic looking like an oxymoron squared is two-edged, reflecting the “multiplexity” of China’s business system in which two very different business systems coexist (Witt & Redding, 2013), which together are captured in the concept “authoritarian capitalism” (Witt & Redding, 2014).”
State capitalism in international context: Varieties and variations (2020, background): “…mechanism is based on the ownership rights that the state can leverage to direct firms toward specific goals determined by the political agenda of the state, which might be very different for developmental, welfare, predatory, and regulatory states (Fainshmidt et al., 2018; Witt & Redding, 2013).”
Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation (2016, background): “…national diversity exists across several core institutional domains such as education and skills formation, employment relations, financial system, interfirm networks, internal dynamics of the firm, ownership and corporate governance, and the institutions of the state itself (Witt & Redding, 2013).”
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, unknown): “Indeed, although NBSs have been used as a broad comparative framework, scholars focused on the developing world have argued the need for alternative NBS classifications that capture wider intra-system complexities (Nölke and Vliegenthart 2009; Witt and Redding 2013; Wood and Frynas 2006).”
Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries (2016, methodology): “Still, as Witt and Redding (2013) sustain, there is considerable variance among these nations in this regard.”
The Dynamics of Political Embeddedness in China* (2017, unknown): “The Chinese state’s relationship to the economy was very complex—not just predatory but also at different times and in different places developmental, entrepreneurial, and embedded (Witt and Redding, 2013)—due to temporal and spatial variation in its economic and political institutions.”
The Mirror Effect: Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Firm Performance in Coordinated Market Economies and Liberal Market Economies (2019, background): “The VoC framework is far from perfect (Allen, 2004) in terms of its lack of applicability to Asian countries (Witt and Redding, 2013), the presence of ‘hybrid’ market economies (Hall and Soskice, 2001) and the underestimation of institutional change (Crouch, 2005).”
New Varieties of State Capitalism: Strategic and Governance Implications (2015, background): “Comparative social scholars point out that the early industrial development of many countries was often associated with massive state involvement through SOEs or state-owned development agencies (Amsden, 2001; Evans, 1995; Witt & Redding, 2013).”