Linguistic Gender and Spoken-Word Recognition in French

By Delphine Dahan, Daniel Swingley, Michael K. Tanenhaus, James S. Magnuson. 2000

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d60da38709ccdd0b37e19dacd98c1d9984f16a94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition (2001, result): “This is consistent with ‘‘cohort’’ effects previously demonstrated with the eye-tracking paradigm (Allopenna et al., 1998; Dahan et al., 2000; Tanenhaus et al., 1995).”
Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition (2016, background): “Native adults as well as children as young as 28 months use gender on determiners to pre-activate noun labels of the objects that are presented, and they will show faster looking times to the target pictures and less competition from other nouns/objects in the display when gender information clearly”
Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension (2002, methodology): “Coders used the crosshairs generated by the eye tracker to establish, for each experimental trial, which of the four pictures or the cross was fixated at each time frame (see Dahan et al. (2000), for full details on the coding procedure).”
WHEN GENDER AND LOOKING GO HAND IN HAND (2013, background): “In line with previous fi ndings (Dahan et al., 2000 ; Lew-Williams & Fernald, 2007 ), results for the native Spanish-speaking group showed evidence of the use of gender marking on articles to anticipate upcoming nouns in contexts in which two pictured objects belonged to different gender classes.”
Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability (2013, background): “in French (le bouton – ‘theMASC button’ versus la bouteille – ‘theFEM bottle’), native French listeners do not consider phonologically similar nouns as competitors anymore (Dahan et al., 2000).”
Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition (2004, background): “Definite articles would have been marked for gender in Dutch ; as Dahan et al .”