Negative entrenchment: A usage-based approach to negative evidence

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Avoiding dative overgeneralisation errors: semantics, statistics or both? (2014, background): “However, it is extremely 220 B. Ambridge et al. difficult to do so with corpus data, since the two predictors are inevitably highly correlated (r 0.9 for the present dataset) (though see Goldberg, 2011; Stefanowitsch, 2008, 2011).”
The roles of verb semantics, entrenchment, and morphophonology in the retreat from dative argument-structure overgeneralization errors (2012, background): “Recently, Stefanowitsch (2008) provided support for the role of entrenchment in constraining dative overgeneralization errors.”
Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption (2011, background): “Stefanowitsch (2008)’s proposal for addressing this issue is discussed in section 4 below, where we see that it falls prey to the same sort of counterexamples given in (7)-(10).”
Learning What NOT to Say: The Role of Statistical Preemption and Categorization in A-Adjective Production (2011, background): “More-over, at least within the domain of morphology, it seems that children are often quite responsive to recasts when they hear them (Saxton et al. 1988, Saxton 1997, Strapp et al. 2008), although this remains somewhat controversial (Morgan et al. 1995).”