A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective.

By M. Nelson, M. Friedlander. 2001

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d571c2ca7d2348d36749ab9518897803027e9fba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Using client feedback in psychotherapy training: An analysis of its influence on supervision and counselor self-efficacy. (2009, background): “Although the literature is clear that successful supervision is predicated on a good supervisory alliance (Nelson & Friedlander, 2001), the literature is less clear on how successful supervision is defined, particularly as regards the perspectives of the other stakeholders in the therapy process.”
Recognizing, Assessing, and Intervening With Problems of Professional Competence (2007, unknown): “…that reveals differential outcomes based on gender in terms of process (Granello, 2003; Granello, Beamish, & Davis, 1997; Sells, Goodyear, Lichtenberg, & Polkinghorne, 1997), support (Nelson & Friedlander, 2001; Wester, Vogel, & Archer, 2004), and evaluation (Chung, Marshall, & Gordon, 2001).”
A model for the supervisor–doctoral student relationship (2009, methodology): “Several more general supervisory instruments have been used such as the supervisory style inventory (Nelson and Friedlander 2001) but this questionnaire is not thoroughly adjusted for the situation of PhD candidates.”
Effective and Ineffective Supervision (2013, background): “…has pointed out that supervision, arguably with benevolent intentions, has also proven at times to be problematic, counterproductive, harmful, and unethical (Ellis, 2001; Gray, Ladany, Walker, & Ancis, 2001; Ladany, Lehrman-Waterman, Molilnaro, & Wolgast, 1999; Nelson & Friedlander, 2001).”