Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale
By Stephen A. Woods, S. Hampson. 2005
361 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d571811b4965117a6c4909918b216ec425969035
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Adrian Furnham
- Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
- D. Paulhus
- P. Jonason
- Harald Schoen
- Gregory D. Webster
- M. Steinbrecher
- D. Doherty
In Social Psychology
- Adrian Furnham
- Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
- Gregory D. Webster
- E. Bennett
- Jeffery J. Mondak
- D. Doherty
- Robert r. Taylor
- Conor M. Dowling
In Sociology and Political Science
- Harald Schoen
- M. Steinbrecher
- G. Huber
- D. Doherty
- Conor M. Dowling
- A. Gerber
- Shang E. Ha
- Bryce J. Dietrich
Citations in the corpus
- Personality and Political Discussion (2011, background): “Fortunately, as we discussed earlier, in recent years psychologists have worked to develop five and ten item personality surveys that perfectly suit our needs (Gosling et al. 2003; Rammstedt and John 2007; Woods and Hampson 2005 ).”
- Is short in length short in content? An examination of the domain representation of the Ten Item Personality Inventory scales in Dutch language (2008, methodology): “Although the completion time of these instruments is considerably shorter as compared to the NEO-PI-R, the need for an even briefer instrument remained ( Woods & Hampson, 2005 ).”
- The single-item need to belong scale. (2013, background): “As a result, many single-item scales have emerged , including measures of self-esteem (Robins, Hendin, & Trzesniew ski, 2001 ), the Big Five (Woods & Hampson, 2005 ), and job satisfaction (Wanous et al., 1997 ).”
- Personality Traits and the Consumption of Political Information (2011, background): “…Five trait, interitem correlations between the two items used to measure each trait are less informative of the items’ reliability (Gosling, 2009; more generally, see Kline, 2000 and Woods & Hampson, 2005 on the misleading nature of alphas calculated on scales with only a small number of items).”
- Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Moral Judgment: The Role of Followers’ Perceived Accountability and Self-leadership (2014, background): “…to assess job satisfaction (Wanous et al. 1997), quality of life (Zimmerman et al. 2006), big five personality dimensions (Paulhus and Bruce 1992; Woods and Hampson 2005), readiness to change (Williams et al. 2007) or self-esteem Table 4 Hierarchical moderated regression results Dependent…”
- Construct Validation of a short Five-Factor Model Instrument: A Self-Peer Study on the German Adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-G). (2007, neutral): “Woods and Hampson (2005) developed a five-item instrument (the SIMP) by providing characterizations of each of the 10 poles of the FFM dimensions; the SIMP measures were reliable (i.e., temporally stable), showed reasonable self/other agreement in four of the five domains, converged with other…”
- A new measure of brand personality (2009, background): “The trend away from overly long scales (Burisch, 1997) and the demand for efficient yet psychometrically soundmeasures resulted first in a 40-itemversion (Saucier,1994), and recently in 10- (Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003; Rammstedt & John, 2007) and 5-item scales (Woods & Hampson, 2005).”
- The self-report method. (2007, methodology): “Other successful examples are the Flve-Item Personality Inventory (FIPI) (Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003) and the Single-Item Measures of Personality (SIMP)(Woods & Hampson, 2005), which capture each of the Big Five factors with a single item.”
- The happy personality: Mediational role of trait emotional intelligence (2007, background): “There is growing interest in short measures of personality and recent research has shown that even single item measures of the Big Five have adequate reliability and validity ( Woods & Hampson, 2005 ).”