The self-report method.
By D. Paulhus, Simine Vazire. 2007
1,385 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aaf209e53a0837621062126080263a89a38321d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- W. Bleidorn
- Jan Cieciuch
- Christopher J. Hopwood
- M. Back
- Margaret L. Kern
- Daria J. Kuss
- C. Kandler
- Maike Luhmann
Citations in the corpus
- Extracting Human Temporal Orientation from Facebook Language (2015, background): “However, self report questionnaires are often used for convenience, not necessarily because they are most valid (Paulhus and Vazire, 2007).”
- Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. (2010, background): “Although researchers will likely continue to rely heavily on self-report instruments, in spite of their well-known limitations (e.g., Paulhus & Vazire, 2007), they should strive to go beyond self-reports when possible (Baumeister, Vohs, & Funder, 2007) and use creative alternative approaches to…”
- Assessing Internet Addiction Using the Parsimonious Internet Addiction Components Model—A Preliminary Study (2013, background): “Typically it is assumed that the individual is the best person to be a judge of him- or herself (Paulhus and Vazire 2009).”
- Longitudinal Experience–Wide Association Studies—A Framework for Studying Personality Change (2020, background): “First, the widespread use of popular self-report measures has certain advantages, such as cost-efficiency, comparability across studies, and the relative sensitivity of self-report to individual differences in the self-concept (Paulhus & Vazire, 2007).”
- Wise Reasoning in the Face of Everyday Life Challenges (2016, background): “Moreover, when memorable experiences are not readily available, abstract self-assessments can be subject to impression management and involuntary self-deception (Paulhus & Vazire, 2007; Vazire & Carlson, 2010).”
- A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the PERMA Model of Well-Being (2015, background): “In their study, Perissinotto et al. (2012) demonstrated that loneliness is an identifiable and measurable risk factor for morbidity and mortality.”
- Contextualized Personality, beyond Traits (2015, background): “…& Angleitner, 2004; Hogan, 1982), certain characteristics (e.g. autobiographical narratives) are only capable of being assessed via self-report, as self-report constitutes the most direct route to a person’s psychological experiences (Barresi & Juckes, 1997; Johnson, 1997; Paulhus & Vazire, 2007).”
- Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys (2015, background): “For instance, according to [28], factors such as ambiguity, emotions, and rapid responding together with the retrospective collection of survey data can induce an extreme responding bias in scale-rating diaries.”
- Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. (2009, methodology): “Both these methods have been criticized (e.g. Paulhus & Vazire, 2007).”
- Measuring Personality Constructs: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Self-Reports, Informant Reports and Behavioural Assessments (2008, methodology): “Paulhus and Vazire (2007) made a similar suggestion when it comes to self reports: " As with the use of any method, self-reports should be corroborated with alternative assessment methods " (p. 235).”
- Value tradeoffs propel and inhibit behavior: Validating the 19 refined values in four countries (2017, methodology): “We followed the recommendation in Cieciuch and Schwartz (2012) and ran separate models for each higher-order value for the following reasons: (i) the number of respondents in all but the Polish sample was too small to assess models with 19 latent variables and 57 value items or 85 behavior items rel”
- Automatic personality assessment through social media language. (2015, background): “Because they are derived from a target’s language in a social setting, LBAs share some features of self-report (Paulhus & Vazire, 2007).”