WRITING META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS

By R. Rosenthal. 1995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

External Validity: From Do-Calculus to Transportability Across Populations (2014, methodology): “Clearly, the same data-sharing philosophy can be used to guide Meta-Analysis (Glass, 1976; Hedges and Olkin, 1985; Rosenthal, 1995; Owen, 2009), where one attempts to combine results from many experimental and observational studies, each conducted on a different population and under a different set ”
A Meta-Analytic Review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations (2003, background): “In addition, attempts were made to locate ‘‘fugitive literature’’ (Rosenthal, 1995, p. 185) by contacting authors to request missing correlations and unpublished data sets.”
Learner Characteristics that Influence the Treatment Effectiveness of Early Literacy Interventions: A Meta–Analytic Review (2003, methodology): “We made several decisions during the literature review process based on commonly used meta-analytic literature review guidelines to reduce redundancy or overweights of estimates from interdependence in the research samples or measures (Cooper & Hedges, 1996; Glass et al., 1981; Rosenthal, 1995).”
A meta‐analysis of psychopathy‐, antisocial PD‐ and FFM associations (2009, result): “Because journals may be selective in publishing results that are characterized by lower p values and larger effect sizes (Rosenthal, 1995), we also attempted to add non-published studies to the MA-database.”
Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach (2015, methodology): “Specifically, multiple search methods were used in order to avoid publication bias of retrieving only the studies that were published due to significant results and larger effect sizes (Rosenthal, 1995).”
Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis (2015, methodology): “Specifically, the impact of choice set complexity is captured by 18 observations derived from nine studies reported in four different articles by Chernev (2005); Gourville and Soman (2005); Chernev and Hamilton (2009), and Sela et al. (2009). The impact of decision task difficulty is captured in 17 ”
Understanding Meta-Analysis: A Review of the Methodological Literature (2008, methodology): “Guidance for writing up meta-analyses is also available ( Halvorsen, 1994 ; Light, Singer, & Willett, 1994 ; Rosenthal, 1995 ).”
Interactions between Type of Instruction and Type of Language Feature: A Meta-Analysis. (2010, background): “As illustrated in Figure 1, explicit and implicit instructions do not overlap with each other, indicating that these differences are reliable.9 Following Rosenthal (1991, 1995), we further examined the binominal 281 Language Learning 60:2, June 2010, pp. 263–308 Spada and Tomita Type of Instruction ”
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects (2007, background): “One bonus was that this set of criteria addressed the file-drawer problem, since journals are likely to publish research results that are statistically significant and thus have effect sizes larger than those that have not and could inflate results [76].”
Diversity in Alliance Portfolios and Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis (2017, methodology): “Finally, to address the “file drawer problem” (Rosenthal, 1995), we posted a call for papers in the following seven listservs (electronic mailing lists) in Academy of Management: BPS-NET, ENTREP, OB, OMT, STUDENT-L, TIM, and IMD-L.”
Do Book Giveaway Programs Promote the Home Literacy Environment and Children’s Literacy-Related Behavior and Skills? (2020, methodology): “A random effects model was used (Rosenthal, 1995) and moderator-analysis was carried out to explain heterogeneity.”
Pancultural Gender Differences in the Relation Between Perceived Parental Acceptance and Psychological Adjustment of Children and Adult Offspring (2015, methodology): “Both fail-safe numbers are higher than the critical limit proposed by Rosenthal (1995), thus indicating robust relationships between psychological adjustment and perceived paternal acceptance of children.”
Self-Concept of Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis (2002, methodology): “As noted by Rosenthal (1995) and Johnson and Eagly (2000), a mean effect size based on a greatly heterogeneous sample of effect sizes is likely to be misleading unless factors accounting for such variability are explained.”
Firm-Specific Assets, Multinationality, and Financial Performance: A Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration (2011, unknown): “Finally, requests were posted on AIB and Academy of Management listservs to elicit unpublished research in an effort to address the “file-drawer” problem (Rosenthal, 1995).”