Design and Analysis of Experiments: Introduction to Experimental Design
By K. Hinkelmann, O. Kempthorne. 1994
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- V. Korzun
- T. Miedaner
- H. H. Geiger
- Alex Housen
- F. Wilde
- Aline Godfroid
- F. Boers
- E. Ebmeyer
Citations in the corpus
- AN EYE FOR WORDS (2013, methodology): “The paragraphs were presented to the participants according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design (Hinkelmann & Kempthorne, 2008 ; Kutner, Nachtsheim, Neter, & Li, 2005 ), so that, in the end, each participant read three paragraphs per condition, in a counterbalanced fashion.”
- The estimating function bootstrap (2000, methodology): “The corrections were included in the discussion of the iid EF bootstrap to keep a parallel with the iid C bootstrap as defined in Huet, Jolivet & Mess6an (1990) or Efron (1979).”
- The use of design of experiments to improve a neural network model in order to predict the thickness of the chromium layer in a hard chromium plating process (2010, methodology): “For instance, a linear model with two factors (or input parameters), X1 and X2, can be written as [30]: Y = β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 + β12X1X2 + experimental error.”
- Comparison of phenotypic and marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance and DON content in spring wheat (2007, methodology): “The delta method based on Taylor approximation was employed to back transform the means of genotypes and standard errors to the original scale (Hinkelmann and Kempthorne 1994).”
- SISVAR: A COMPUTER ANALYSIS SYSTEM TO FIXED EFFECTS SPLIT PLOT TYPE DESIGNS (2019, background): “There are several other types of SPD, as can be seen in Hinkelmann and Kempthorne (2008).”