The Uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise – from internalization to coordination of networks
By J. Vahlne, Jan-Erik Johanson. 2013
411 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d51e668509d37069eb79446f19f3e8f19a36cf28
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Marina Dabic
- Massimiliano Matteo Pellegrini
- Keith D. Brouthers
- Léo‐Paul Dana
- Andrea Caputo
- Jesper N. Wulff
- Jean-françois Hennart
- K. Meyer
In Strategy and Management
- Kim Dung Geisser
- Marina Dabic
- Massimiliano Matteo Pellegrini
- Keith D. Brouthers
- Franz Rothlauf
- Léo‐Paul Dana
- Andrea Caputo
- Jesper N. Wulff
Citations in the corpus
- Pathways of SME internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review (2019, background): “In addition, the Uppsala model explains the phenomenon of FDI (Vahlne and Johanson, 2013), though, SMEs rarely get involved in FDI - the most advanced level of internalization.”
- Explaining the internationalization of ibusiness firms (2015, background): “…that allow it to minimize costs (investment risks) while concentrating on developing networks in the foreign market built on trust, knowledge, and commitment to aid the fi rm as it tries to become an insider and get embedded in the local network (Johanson & Vahlne, 2009; Vahlne & Johanson, 2013).”
- A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise (2014, neutral): “The dynamic capabilities perspective goes beyond organizational “fit”,58 and also beyond a financialstatement view of enterprise strength, to emphasize recognition of the most promising opportunities and the managerial orchestration needed to create, accommodate, and fashion resources both inside…”