Jane M. Blazeby

Economics and Econometrics · 2006–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Jane M. Blazeby trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher
  2. Douglas G. Altman
  3. K. F. Schulz

Papers from Jane M. Blazeby's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jane M. Blazeby trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  2. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  3. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  4. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
  5. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  6. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (British medical journal)
  7. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  8. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (Quality of Life Research)
  9. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (Pain)
  10. Research: increasing value, reducing waste 1 How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set

Their papers