IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN SOCIAL EXCHANGE

By Linda D. Molm, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Gretchen N. Peterson. 2003

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d38673f143cdf5fb8878a6737c429fd11305526f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. J. L. Pierce
2. Tom Tyler
3. Steffen Mau
4. Linn van Dyne
5. D. G. Gardner
6. L. Osberg
7. He Peng
8. David de Cremer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Osberg
2. Rebecca E. Hollander-Blumoff
3. J. L. Pierce
4. M. Zafirovski
5. Tom Tyler
6. Steffen Mau
7. Timothy M. Smeeding
8. Linn van Dyne

Citations in the corpus

• Procedural Justice in Negotiation: Procedural Fairness, Outcome Acceptance, and Integrative Potential (2008, background): “In one relevant study, Molm, Takahashi, and Peterson (2003) compare negotiation to reciprocal exchange and find that negotiation may enhance the view that other parties are procedurally unfair, lowering willingness to accept agreements reached.”
• Social Exchange Theory under Scrutiny: A Positive Critique of its Economic-Behaviorist Formulations (2005, background): “This approach rests on the premise that equity or fairness is ‘in the eye of the beholder’ (Molm et al., 2003), thus making distributive justice a sort of sociopsychological phenomenon.”
• Social influence of a coworker: A test of the effect of employee and coworker exchange ideologies on employees’ exchange qualities. (2011, unknown): “…ideology are more likely to perceive unfairness and to feel they are being taken advantage of even in an objectively fair exchange relationship (Molm et al., 2003), they are more likely to harbor negative feelings about their own social exchanges and to express them to the others (i.e., to the…”
• “Fair” Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective (2006, background): “Objectively, as Burtless and Jencks (2003) and Osberg, Smeeding, and Schwabish (2004) noted, there is no good evidence that more inequality produces more of any good thing,”
• The effects of pay level on organization‐based self‐esteem and performance: A field study (2004, background): “The pattern of exchanges develops over time (not on the basis of discrete acts) and leads to perceptions of fairness or justice regarding the exchange relationship (Molm et al., 2003).”
• Welfare Regimes and the Norms of Social Exchange (2004, background): “Experimental studies have demonstrated that reciprocal exchange is of paramount importance for building and maintaining social relationships: ‘In other words, the act of reciprocity is valued, over and above the objective benefits of exchange’ (Molm et al., 2003: 150).”