Welfare Regimes and the Norms of Social Exchange

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences? (2010, background): “Regimes should have a formative effect on citizens’ preferences (Gelissen, 2002; Mau, 2004) because they embody specific ideas which ‘promote different ways of valuing market distribution and Journal of European Social Policy 2010 20 (4) the redistributive responsibilities of government’…”
Welfare Regimes and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited (2006, background): “These solidarity and social justice principles are seen as historically and culturally embedded in welfare state institutions which continuously shape public discourse and individual values (Hall, 1986; Rothstein, 1998; Mau, 2004).”
Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence (2016, background): “This theory assumes that the institutional settings of distinct welfare regimes (re)produce and foster different logics of solidarity (Svallfors, 1997; Arts and Gelissen, 2001; Mau, 2004; Larsen, 2006, 2008).”