The Articulated Learning: An Approach to Guided Reflection and Assessment
By S. Ash, Patti H. Clayton. 2004
339 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2c113c375e968016a7da80e6d6f72e539ac1dd8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing Learning in Service-Learning Courses through Critical Reflection (2011, background): “…reflection is perhaps the most challenging aspect of service-learning to assess, stemming from difficulties in developing and implementing effective measures (Simmons & Gleary, 2005) and tools to evaluate and deepen learning outcomes (Ash & Glayton, 2004; Ash, Glayton, & Atkinson, 2005).”
- An Exploratory Study of the Supervision of Ph.D./Research Students’ Theses (2008, background): “They need to be able to assess their own performance critically, reflect on their assessment, and learn from it (Ash and Clayton 2004), thus constantly improving their academic supervision capability.”
- The Quality of Reflection in Student Journals: A Review of Limiting and Enabling Factors (2010, background): “2008) & Valli’s Typology (1997) & Schön’s Reflective Practitioner framework (1983) & Hatton and Smith’s Framework (1995) & Merizow’s Typology (Merizow and Associates 1990) & Bloom’s Taxonomy of Higher Order Thinking (1956) & Ash and Clayton’s Articulated Learning model (2004) Innov High Educ (2010) ”
- Beyond Interpersonal Competence: Teaching and Learning Professional Skills in Sustainability (2017, background): “Another individual assignment involves writing a reading response to each textbook chapter and students own personal skill practice pertinent to the chapter’s skill domain, drawing on the method of articulated learning [59].”
- Building a Lens for Critical Reflection and Reflexivity in Social Work Education (2010, methodology): “The DEAL model (Ash and Clayton, 2004) offers a structure for educators to challenge bias, and examine beliefs, values, and the construction of knowledge for social work practice.”